Learn, Unlearn, and Re-learn – Learning 3.0?

“The illiterate of the 21st century,will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.” – Alvin Toffler

Times are changing…the 1970s and 80s were about how well we could learn, the 1990s and 2000s focused on how fast and how much we could learn, whilst today’s education should be based on how much we can unlearn. Learning to let go of old and out of date rules is one of the skills we all need to develop.

“…the key to unlearning is to come to the realisation that ‘we are all in a fog’, and can’t clearly see the future. Unlearning will be a strategy for coping with rapid change and uncertainties, but unlearning is not simply about forgetting something, sometimes it is about rejecting a previously held belief, or repudiating a long revered theory. This often feels counterintuitive for educators, and can pose a threat to many learners…

Our current school systems are designed around learning as the acquistion of knowledge. The challenge is to try to turn this around so that students have the opportunity not just to learn new things, but also the challenge to unlearn and then relearn. Sometimes we really do need to knock things down before we can build them up again…”, read more…

Post by Steve Wheeler

Designing for Conscious Decisions – Tin Can API

After looking at the reality of a Tin Can API world, Megan Bowe urges L&D to challenge the status quo by giving learners ownership and control of their personal data.

The premise of the article is that in a world where data is being collected in droves, we need to design better ways for people to understand what they’re giving up and ways for them to take ownership. It’s a challenge to the status quo. It’s a new world that learning and development needs to consider carefully. There’s no easy answer for exactly how to do this, but it’s conversation that we need to have, read more…

Post by Megan Bowe

Learning 3.0

Learning 3.0

Learning 3.0

I see it arising partly from what is happening on the web right now, but also as a result of new intelligent filtering tools. Increasingly, as users contribute to the content, links and pathways of the social web, it will become more ‘intelligent’, and will recommend to its users the best ways to find what they are looking for. It will also recommend things that users don’t know they need yet, predicting their ‘needs’ based on their previous behaviour and choices. Learning 3.0 will see learners using sophisticated new web tools that are intricately connected to each other, are context aware, and are accessed through intuitive and natural interfaces…read more

Post by Steve Wheeler

 

What is the Tin Can API?

The Tin Can API (sometimes known as the Experience API) is a brand new specification for learning technology that makes it possible to collect data about the wide range of experiences a person has (online and offline).

The website covers all aspects of Tin Can API aka Experience API…click here to read more!

Alternative’s to Kirkpatrick: Brinkerhoff’s Success Case Method

Instructional Design Fusions

As learning experience designers (aka instructional designers aka performance improvement consultants), we constantly try to improve upon our own processes. Are we meeting the needs of our learners? Are we creating learning opportunities that impact organizational performance?

When it comes to learning solutions leveraged in organizations, Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model is often looked to as the assessment method, despite its focus on training events rather than on learning processes.  In my previous post, I  described an alternative approach to Kirkpatrick’s model—Kaufman’s 5 levels of evaluation.  In this post, I’ll take a look at a more flexible model, Brinkerhoff’s Success Case Method.

Brinkerhoff: A focus on systems

Brinkerhoff (2005) squarely addresses one of the critiques of Kirkpatrick’s model: “Performance results can’t be achieved by training alone; therefore training should not be the object of evaluation” (p. 87). According to Brinkerhoff, this is like saying that the success of a marriage depends on…

View original post 482 more words